Showing posts with label FM Screening. Show all posts
Showing posts with label FM Screening. Show all posts

Friday, January 20, 2012

FM Screening - Second Order 20 micron FM/Stochastic Screen


[click "Play" to view animation - may take a moment to buffer]

This is a second order FM screen (Kodak Staccato). In a first order FM screen, dots of the same size are added to simulate darker tones. In a second order FM screen, dots of the same size are added to simulate darker tones – however at a certain tone value no more dots are added. Instead the existing dots simply grow, in one or two directions, in order to simulate darker tones.



Saturday, September 17, 2011

Analog FM screening

I've been using FM screening in presswork since 1970 (kindergartens were very sophisticated back then :-)). This was way before PhotoShop, personal computers, and digital workflows. The method I used was fairly simple, but difficult to perfect.

I would take a conventional low contrast 35mm black and white (or color slide) positive image.

I would then place the piece of film in my enlarger in the darkroom.

Then I would project the image through a piece of frosted glass that had the frosted side in contact with a piece of lithographic film.Lithographic film does not record grey levels - just black and white. It is the same film that printers use to expose their printing plates.
The rough surface of the frosted side of the glass acted like a digital threshold array and broke the image into a random halftone pattern where the frequency of the dots (and to a lesser extent their size) represented the different grey levels of the original image.The coarseness of the frosted side of the glass determined how coarse the resulting "FM" screen was.

The final result was a piece of negative film that my printer would strip into the the job and use to burn the printing plate.

Thursday, October 28, 2010

How AM and FM screening equivalencies are measured


I'm often asked about what AM/XM halftone screens are equivalent to a certain FM screen - i.e. "What AM/XM screen is equivalent to a 20 micron FM screen?"

There are two ways that this halftone screening equivalency is usually measured.

One is equivalency of detail rendering - the ability of the screening to render image detail. The other is lithographic equivalency - how they perform on press lithographically. Note that in both cases, because the respective screening technology is so different, equivalency can only be an approximation.

Equivalency of detail rendering
Since halftone dots form the printed image - more dots per linear inch translates into more detail that can be rendered.

With an AM screen the detail rendering ability is specified in lpi (or lpc) - i.e. halftone dots per inch (e.g. 175 lpi or 60 lpc).

Since an FM screen has no "lines per inch" determining the equivalent detail rendering equivalency is usually done by drawing a line through the FM screen and counting how many dots are intersected (crossed) in a distance of one inch.
Measuring the relative lpi of an FM screen.

The above example shows an FM screen enlarged. The distance measured is 1/16th of an inch. In that 1/16th of an inch approximately 36 dots are intersected. So, in one inch about 576 dots would be intersected (16 x 36). Put another way, there are 576 dots per linear inch - 576 lpi - to render detail, i.e. this FM screen is equivalent to a 576 lpi AM/XM screen.

Lithographic equivalency
Lithographic equivalency is a bit more complicated to figure out. It is usually measured by counting the number of edges (transitions) in a square inch.
Measuring the number of edges of an AM/XM screen.

Measuring the number of edges of an FM screen.

Halftone screens with a similar number of edge transitions will have similar lithographic properties.

AM/XM equivalents of some popular FM screens.
Keep in mind, these are approximations only, however they do give a good indication as to screening performance.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Esko Concentric screening - some observations

Esko Concentric screening is at heart an AM screen which uses a unique halftone dot where solid AM dots are divided into thin concentric rings.
Click on the above image to see it enlarged.

Concentric screening and color gamut
Chroma in press work derives primarily from the ratio of light being filtered by ink carried on halftone dots vs light reflected off the paper that hasn't been filtered by the ink. Light that is unfiltered by the ink effectively contaminates the color reducing the potential gamut of the inks. If one compares Concentric halftone dots with conventional AM/XM halftone dots at the same lpi - e.g. 175 lpi. what is clear is the difference in ink coverage area through which light can be filtered.
At left is a micro photo of Esko Concentric and on the right is an AM/XM screen (Esko Paragon). Both are imaged at 175 lpi.

Note that dividing the dot into rings actually lessens the area of ink and increases the area of unprinted paper. Effectively it increases the contamination of color by light reflected off of the unprinted substrate which can actually reduce, rather than increase, the potential gamut.

In the below plot, the CIEL*a*b* values of the same tone values for 175 lpi AM/XM/Paragon screening (in green) is compared to 175 lpi Concentric (in red). If the Concentric had a larger gamut the red dots would be significantly above the green dots indicating a greater chroma. Instead they track at, or are below, the chroma for 175 lpi AM/XM/Esko Paragon screening.
What this means is that, as far as I can determine, Concentric screening offers no additional gamut, and possibly less of a gamut, when it is compared with AM/XM screens at the same lpi.

Concentric screening and image quality
Since it is still an AM screen there is still the opportunity for screening and subject moiré - although the finer the screen (AM/XM or Concentric) the less likely that will be a problem. Because it's still an AM halftone screen it has rosettes - just like any other AM/XM screen - formed by the screen angles.
At left Esko Paragon AM rosettes. At right Esko Concentric rosettes. Both screens are 175 lpi. (Squint your eyes or move a few feet away from the screen to make the rosettes more prominent.)

From a print buyer point of view there will likely be no visible difference between a 200-300 lpi conventional AM/XM screen and Concentric screening - even if viewed under a loupe.

Concentric screening and ink reduction
The two primary causes of the reduction in ink usage with high lpi screens are the thinner ink films and the need for tone reproduction curves for plate imaging to bring the press tone response in line with the standard 175 lpi AM/XM screening. Ink reduction with the use of Concentric screening should be similar to the ink reduction enjoyed by high lpi conventional AM/XM as well as FM screens.

Concentric screening and on press color stability
Greater color stability when solid ink densities naturally vary during the press run is a characteristic of high frequency screening (i.e. smaller dots) whether AM/XM, FM or Concentric. The actual ink film thickness of Concentric vs conventional AM/XM screening at the same lpi is actually very similar. Projecting dot density to height in 3D one can see this quite clearly (Concentric is left of the black line - AM/XM is right of the black line.)Of course, if the Concentric screening is run at a very high lpi it will acquire a stability that is similar to conventional screens (AM/XM and FM) that are run to the same high frequency.

Concentric screening and imaging system resolution
Concentric screening is effectively an AM screen ruling multiplier. What this means is that the resolution of the imaging system needs to be able to image the minimum specified ring width. Put another way, if the ring thickness called for is 10 microns wide then the imaging system (plate and press) must be capable of consistently imaging a 10 micron pixel/dot even though the actual final halftone dot size may be almost five times wider (e.g. 48 microns wide a 50% dot at 250 lpi).
Concentric halftone dots that depend on 1-2 pixel width imaging integrity can be problematic for most imaging systems

As a result, using Concentric screeing can push the effective screen frequency so high that process stability and imaging may be compromised and it can be difficult to support their use on plate let alone find a way to implement them in the press room. The problem is that some concentric screen settings can drive rulings way over what plate imaging can support - on the order of 1-2 pixel widths for the rings, which is understandably problematic. For example, a 200 lpi screen with 2 pixel ringwidths = 600 lpi which is finer than, for example, a 10 micron FM screen.

Coarser ringwidths are easier to support but at that point it is probably more effective to use an AM screen of equivalent lpi.

For printers contemplating the adoption of Concentric screening
Since Concentric screening is a conventional AM screen using a unique halftone dot design, I suggest that when you are evaluating this type of screening that you "compare apples to apples". That means that you should compare the on press performance of Concentric against a conventional AM/XM screen imaged at the same lpi. Use a combination of subjective (pretty pictures) as well as objective measurable targets (single and two color step wedge gradients and IT8 profiling targets).

N.B. The data that I used as the basis for this post is derived from published promotional samples printed by Esko. I have contacted Esko as well as members of public prepress/press forums asking for press profiles and/or printed test samples of Concentric vs conventional AM/XM screens run at the same lpi under the same press conditions. Despite the product being in the market for over four years I have been unable to acquire such a basic color profile or press samples. If you have that data I would appreciate hearing from you by email ( pritchardgordon @ gmail (dot) com ).

Friday, August 27, 2010

Halftones as you've never seen them before

I use a variety of image analysis tools when investigating how different halftone screening solutions perform. These tools are normally used in the medical field to do image analysis of microscope acquired imagery. However I press them into service to analyze various aspects of halftone dot structures.

Here is a microscope view (200x) of a conventional AM/XM printed halftone dot (175 lpi elliptical):
And here's a microscope view (also 200x) of a 20 micron FM screen:
One of my favorite tools is to use image analysis software to project the pixel density values in the images into height - creating a 3D image that shows the relative ink density (ink film thickness) differences between the two screens. The thicker AM/XM:vs the thinner FM:Using color mapping instead of the actual ink color makes the difference in ink film thickness even clearer (yellow = greatest - blue= lowest ink film density):Lowering the viewpoint and warping the perspective of the 175 lpi AM/XM screen begins to turn the image into a kind of landscape: However, using terrain mapping software on those original microscope images of the AM/XM and FM screens really makes the transformation of the images into proper landscape views a reality.

175 lpi elliptical dots:
Sunlight across a deep FM canyon:
A low flight over a a barren land where FM and AM screens meet.
Sunrise over an AM screen mesa.
Moonrise over an FM peak.
FM screen hits the wall.

Planet Round Dot.

And if you have a pair of these:
You can add a bit of dimension to your halftones:
Of course, this is all very serious work - not fun at all. Really. ;-)

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Implementing FM Screening

The foundations of successful FM screening implementation include the following steps:

1) Make sure that everyone in the shop that is involved with print sales and production understands why the company is changing the print process. All should want the change to succeed and should see a payback specific to their area. Sales will have a new story to tell about the company's ability to meet buyer expectations. Prepress and pressroom will be able to stabilize and optimize their areas. Management should see a clear differentiator, reduced manufacturing costs and more consistent product.

2) Make sure that the plates have the resolution to support FM at the chosen micron size (typically 20-25 micron for general commercial, 25-35 micron for publications and newsprint). Contact your local service or sales representative for the current list of qualified media.

3) Make sure that your CtP has the capability to do FM at the chosen micron size. Again, contact your local service or sales representative.

4) Communicate your intent to print FM with your ink vendor. Ask them about the ink series you are using and whether it is appropriate for FM. They may suggest a different series based on their experience. If they don't have experience with FM, then involve them in your initial start up and learning. If they are not interested then start looking for a different ink vendor.

5) Your shop should have an existing reliable and consistent print manufacturing process. I.e. the press is not used as a color correction device. One simple test is to have the press operator do their make ready without seeing a proof. In a well run shop, the press can be brought up to color and when then compared to the proof there will be very little difference. If the press operator is lost without the proof then that might indicate that the process is not stable and in control.

6) Build dot gain curves to be applied to plate imaging to bring tone reproduction in line with your current AM/XM printing.

7) Optionally, fine tune your proofing so that it reflects the extra gamut you'll see with FM.

8) Make FM your standard screening - not an exception for special projects. The goal should be that AM/XM screening only be used for special applications like reprints. That way the press operator gain experience and understanding of how FM reacts on press compared to what they are currently familiar with.

9) If you have more than one press/press crew - choose one to be your pioneers and champions of FM printing. They can then teach the other crews the keys to their success.

Generally, most of the problems encountered with implementing FM screening result from print shop culture - not the technology itself.

Fountain Solutions
Due to the over all small dot sizes, ink and water balance is more critical with FM screening (and very high lpi AM/XM screening) than with conventional AM/XM screens at industry standard lpis. So, before switching to FM screening, you should resolve any ink and water issues you have with your current screens.

There are no set rules about fountain solutions and FM, except to use a good product that is recommended by your ink and plate manufacturer. In general, less is best. Where possible, run the minimum dosage in your fountain solutions that the manufacturer recommends.

While FM microdots are less sensitive to physical dot gain from over-inking, they are more sensitive than the larger AM/XM dots to surrounding water levels and fountain conditions. Therefore, it is important to control pH, temperature, conductivity, and contamination in the water pick-up tray and on the chrome or ceramic pick-up rollers. The temperature of the fountain can be controlled in the re-circulation system (keep in mind that temperature in the tray may be 5 to 10 degrees warmer). Fountain temperature should be controlled within 0-5 degrees of manufacturer’s specification. Temperature can be further controlled in the press, using chilled rollers. Buffered fountain solutions help to stablize pH levels; however, pH should still be measured periodically to ensure that it stays within the manufacturer’s specifications. Processed water is recommended to further stabilize conductivity and pH. Check with your supplier to find a water treatment system suited to your printing needs.

A certain level of ink contamination in the fountain is unavoidable; however, excessive contamination is an indicator of other issues. In fact, it may first be noticed in your presswork as all-color "rain," or water streaking. Look for excess ink coming back through the roller train. This is sometimes referred to as chrome roller feedback, pick-up, ink belled back or reverse emulsification. Numerous factors affect this condition, including temperature of ink and fountains, emulsification, press speed, and the condition of the water pick-up roller. Simple remedies include better maintenance of chrome roller surface (no micro-cracks), temperature control, and desensitizing the chrome roller to improve the water pickup and keep ink away.

Back trap piling in the non-image area of the plate or blanket is generally caused by excessive ink in the fountain, low conductivity, and non-image area that is not desensitized – attracting ink instead of repelling it with water. Remember that fountain solution is a mild solvent. As such, if it is over aggressive it may overpower the ink film on the microdots and cause a loss of ink density.

Alcohol and alcohol substitutes help lower surface tension and ink viscosity, which promotes better release of FM's microdots. The amount of alcohol and alcohol substitutes used will depend on environmental restrictions in each locale.
When implementing FM screening it sometimes helps to view the screening in the context of AM/XM halftoning. There are two basic ways to look at how they compare.

The first is related to their resolution, or detail rendering equivalency. That is usually determined by running a line diagonally through the FM screen and then measuring the number of dots per inch along that line. The more dots per inch that the line intersects the higher the effective lpi.

The second is their lithographic equivalency. Basically how the FM screen reacts on press to ink, water, etc. That is usually determined by counting the number of transitions (dot edges) in a given screen tone area and comparing that to the number of transitions in the same tone area in an AM screen.

Here are the numbers for several popular FM dot sizes - micron size compared to lpi:

Detail rendering equivalency:
FM 20 = 500 lpi
FM 25 = 325 lpi
FM 35 = 325 lpi
FM 36 = 275 lpi

Lithographic equivalency:
FM 20 = 385 lpi
FM 25 = 240 lpi
FM 35 = 240 lpi
FM 36 = 205 lpi

The above equivalencies are for a typical second order FM screen - one that, close up, looks like this:The vast majority of FM screens in use today are second order using similar dot patterns so the equivalencies should be close enough for practical application. These equivalents are not absolute values since they will differ somewhat according to the design of the specific screen and how the engineer calculates equivalency.


Curve Management
The dot gain characteristics of FM require the application of dot gain compensation curves to plates. For predictable tonal response on press, keep the mechanical and chemical conditions on your press well maintained, and only build tonal compensation curves when the press is in a stable condition for your current AM/XM printing.

The basics of building tonal compensation curves to align your AM and FM presswork

1. This will take two press runs - one to get data for your current screening, and the second to get the response of the FM screening. If you have confidence in your current AM/XM presswork you may choose to only do the FM screening pressrun and compare the values it delivers to the target tones of your AM/XM presswork.
2. Your press should be in a stable condition that accurately reflects your pressroom environment, including documented standard ink density (SID) for your shop.
3. Your existing AM/XM presswork should be the tonal target for your FM screened presswork.
4. Image plates for your AM screening using whatever plate curves you currently apply.
5. Image plates for your FM screening without applying any plate curves (uncalibrated plate).
6. Bring your presswork to to standard solid ink densities.
7. Pull several good sheets and measure the CMYK tone scale response of the AM/XM and FM screens. The more sheets you
measure, the more representative the average will be of your printing conditions.
8. Use the measured data to build tonal compensation curves for your FM presswork.
9. Set up your RIP and workflow to manage the application of the FM curves.
10. Create and impose a test target for you FM presswork to confirm that the workflow has image the plate with the correct dot gain compensation curve.
11. Go back on press for a verification run to confirm that the curves for the FM screening are correct. Make adjustments as required.

Color Management
You may optionally decide to profile your FM presswork in order to reflect the added FM gamut so that your proofs are a closer match to your presswork.
1. To color manage a proofing device, build profiles by characterizing your FM presswork proofs with ICC targets or equivalent.
2. Gather the characterization data from your FM verification press run and use the resulting measurements to build an ICC profile to be used in a color-managed workflow to drive your proofer.
3. This is rarely done, however, if desired, you may choose to build a separation profile to convert RGB images to CMYK in order to take advantage of FM screening's larger gamut.

Image Management
1. When printing with FM 20 or FM 10 on coated paper on sheetfed and web presses, scan at resolutions above 300 dpi to take advantage of FM's ability to render and capture very fine details and texture. There is no need to scan higher than 600 dpi.
2. When printing newsprint with FM 36 or FM 25, you do not need to scan images higher than 300 dpi. Typically, images may be scanned at resolutions as low as 150 to 200 dpi. To determine the lowest resolution at which you could scan images and print successfully, do a press test. When the resolution is too low, you may see stair casing around the edges of image objects.
3. Make sure that images are not down sampled when going from native file applications to PDF.4. Make sure that there are no settings in the RIP that will cause images to be resampled at a lower resolution.

The Pressroom

Presses
Older coldset webs may have problems with FM screens and AM/XM screens finer than 110 lpi. Dampening systems running bareback with a durometer reading harder than 34 may have difficulty running FM.

Older presses with conventional dampening systems that use covers, sleeves, socks and/or wraps anywhere in the system may find that the increased detail resolution of FM results in the fabric weave/grain of the dampener material being resolved on the press sheet.

Older webs that can run 133 lpi screens can run 35 micron FM and coarser, while older webs than can run 150 lpi screens can run 25 micron FM and coarser. Older webs without an in-feed can also run 35 micron FM. In-feeds are important for web control and can reduce plate wear, web movement, and linting.

On newspaper webs, printing on paper with a recycled content of 75% or greater may create problems because the paper carries a high amount of silica, which causes piling and plate blinding.

Ink
For all press types, before using FM screens, speak with your ink supplier as they may have identified an ink series that works best with this type of screening. Remember that it is not so much whether the screening is AM/XM or FM that's important, it's the size of the dots through the tone scale that helps determine the formulation and performance of the ink.

When using 25 micron FM, you should be printing with inks that flow well with 133 line AM screens, and, for 20 micron FM you should be printing with inks that flow well with 175 line AM screens.

Ideally, FM inks should have low viscosity and high flow. Low viscosity helps ink shear and transfer to the sheet. Printers can drop viscosity by changing the pigment vehicle (oil), by increasing the water pickup, or by increasing ink temperature. High-pigment, low-gain inks are problematic with FM screening because they have a propensity to pile and print inconsistently.

Remember that each press is different. Settings and inks that work well on one press may not work well on another press.
1. Use progressive-tack as opposed to common-tack inks for FM. Generally, you do not need to change ink tack values or sequence from those used with AM/XM settings.
2. Metallic and fluorescent inks have poor transfer, even with conventional 175 lpi screens. The pigments in these inks are coarse, and little can be done to improve the vehicle. Coarser screens such as 25 or 35 micron FM are better suited to these inks. Check with your ink manufacturer to see what other options are available.
3. Some PMS colors (spot or special color) lead to inconsistent coverage on sheetfed presses. For example, solid tints can appear mottled or look like the texture of an orange peel, and this can impact FM screen tint builds. The pigment in each PMS color can vary considerably therefore you should work your ink manufacturer to optimize performance for the dot size you are printing with. If mottle occurs, it may be necessary to mill/refine/grind the ink a second time to reduce the size of the pigment particles.
4. FM performs best on press when using lower levels of water and just enough ink to achieve desired densities. Use water levels rather than ink density to control FM microdots. Adjusting density to control midtones should be the exception and not common practice with FM.
5. Generally speaking, 175 lpi sheetfed printers are typically well suited to run 20 micron FM with the inks they use for their AM/XM printing; however, these printers may still need to adjust ink flow and viscosity to optimize the ink for FM’s microdots.
6. Use low-viscosity, high-flow inks for heat-set webs. Chilled or water-cooled oscillators keep roller temperatures constant and maintain ink viscosity and performance at ideal levels. If your press doesn’t have this capability, ask your ink manufacturer to help change viscosity by altering water pickup or oil.
7. On web presses, use process black ink instead of book black inks where possible. Process black ink
offers the best results with FM as it behaves like cyan, magenta, and yellow inks.
8. On heat- and cold-set webs, book black and recycled black inks have poor transfer rates, and they behave more like fluorescent and metallic ink. Book black ink is typically used for high-density requirements while recycled, black ink is used in high-volume applications such as publications, newspaper, flexography, and packaging to meet cost and environmental requirements.
9. Heat-set and cold-set web inks are generally suitable for 25 and 36 micron FM and typically do not require changes to formulation or vehicle.
10. For 20 micron FM on web presses, work with your ink manufacturer to optimize performance.

Undesirable Patterns in Presswork
Proper press maintenance should be the policy no matter what halftone screening is being used. However, the finer the screen the more critical proper maintenance becomes since the microdots used in high lpi AM/XM and FM screens can reveal flaws in the presswork that were previously hidden by large AM dots.

Thin Lines in the presswork

Flaws and grind lines on press rollers can cause visible lines to appear in press work when printing with fine AM/XM and FM screens. They are characteristically oriented in the direction of paper travel through the press.

Grind lines are imperfections in the rubber rollers caused by grinding in manufacturing and wear on press. They show up as dark lines in the direction of paper travel with a frequency of one to four millimeters. They can be seen by using a loupe and examinging the solids. They are sometimes visible to the eye between the 50% and 75% FM tints. When water film on press is too thin to fill the grind and wear lines on rubber rollers, the resulting water film is uneven and transferred to the plate. Under 200 lpi, the uneven water film has little effect. However, finer screens can render inconsistencies in the water film, and these flaws show up as thin, dark lines in the presswork.

Roller grind lines are typically found on the water, form, or metering rollers. You can visually monitor the quality of water film by examining your chrome rollers and by examining your presswork. When there are visible fine lines and patterns on the chrome rollers, you have inconsistent water transfer, and the source can be either roller grind lines or overly sensitized rollers. White and milky water film on chrome rollers can identify overly sensitized rollers and can indicate that the rollers need desensitizing to help water move smoothly through the press. Ask your press and/or ink vendor for a suitable desensitizing agent.

Short thin "rain—lines" that vary over the sheet and from sheet to sheet may be caused by water lines. They can be found in solids and screen tints and look somewhat like a rainstorm. When water lines are dark, look for ink/water emulsification problems. When water lines are light (looks like lots of short scratches), water and ink levels are generally too low.

Micro patterning and micro detail

FM screening can resolve both desirable detail in images as well as undesirable detail created at various stages in the reproduction process. In particular, fine artifacts such as photographic grain, paper texture, and image manipulation artifacts may not show up with 150 lpi screens but may be resolved with AM/XM and FM microdots. Careful analysis by measuring the pattern, frequency, and angle of micro structures can help identify whether the source is screening, imaging, processing, or presswork. Rotating the plates and images can also help to narrow down the sources of unwanted patterns.

Mottle

Mottle results in botchy, uneven, flat tints with an orange peel texture and is most evident when you look at solids under a loupe. Mottle may be caused by ink breaking down making solids appear as if the were printed with flexography. It is most commonly seen in Pantone Matching System colors with coarsely ground pigments. It’s also common with high pigment loads when emulsification leads to uneven ink films being transferred to the sheet. Low water levels can cause PMS colors to bleed in FM tints, leading to excessive gain and further mottle. Flat-tint mottles are especially bad in blues, greens, and alkaline browns.

Mottle can also be caused by the substrate if it does not have a consistent ink accepting surface. Sometimes the paper's potential for mottle can be seen by holding the sheet up to a light and seeing if there is a blotchy quality of shiny and matte areas.

Run length

A few printers may experience shorter run lengths with FM screening on heat-set web presses (but not with positive plates or sheetfed presswork). This may be the result plate wear or blinding. On negative plates, calcium carbonate crystals from the paper (two to three microns in size) may accumulate on small dots and cause blinding - the plate image is visible on plate but does not carry ink. The smaller dots in both AM/XM and FM printing are also susceptible to paper piling, which can exacerbate plate wear or cause blinding on poorly maintained web presses.

Sunday, February 14, 2010

The principle of dot gain compensation plate curves

In a film workflow the industry standard was to create film output that was linear. This meant that a 25% tone request in the original Postscript file would create a 25% dot on the film, a 50% request would create a 50% dot, and so one for all requested tone values. However, in a CtP workflow controlling tonality in the print reproduction process, allows you achieve the presswork quality you want without adjusting the press. It also provides the flexibility to tailor the print characteristic to meet different customer expectations.

Dot gain, or tone value increase (TVI), is a normal part of the print reproduction process. Controlling tones using calibration means that you can manipulate the exact size of the dots on the printing plates so that tone saturation and gray balance are controlled on the press sheet.

Tonal calibration can account for:
• type of plate or film used
• type of paper stock used for printing
• type of dot shape used
• type of screening used—for example, FM/Stochastic or AM/XM conventional, and frequency (lines per inch (lpi))

(Note: Adjusting CtP laser exposure is not tonal calibration and will affect the run length and performance of the plate.)

You cannot use tonal calibration as a substitute for stable operating conditions. Operating conditions must be controlled as a separate process. In fact, without a stable operating environment, you cannot achieve accurate tonal calibration let alone reliable press output.

What Is Tonality?

Printers are used to being concerned with dot gain/TVI. Indeed dot gain values are often included in printing specifications. However, for the purposes of calibration - tonality or dot area, rather than dot gain, is the key metric. It does not matter what dot gain you have. What matters is whether you achieve the required final tone values or dot areas at each originally requested tone.
On the left is the desired "correct" tone reproduction and on the right is incorrect tone reproduction.

Tonality in printing is the progression of tints from blank paper to solid ink for each requested tone value in a printing job. It is measured with a densitometer, and reported as either dot gain/TVI or dot area:
Dot area and dot gain - two ways of charting the same data.

The target print characteristic tone curve

Building dot gain compensation plate curves always begins with a target print characteristic, i.e. what you want to achieve on press. This is called the target curve - the current tone reproduction that you wish to achieve. It could be your current press work, a proof, or it could be an industry supplied set of tone values. You measure the target sample and enter the dot area (tonal value) for the tints achieved on the target curve graph. If the target is a press sheet, for example, your current 150 lpi AM/XM presswork, the graph will represent your current tone print characteristic:
Target print characteristic tone curve - what we want our presswork to look like.

If you change your screening, for example going to FM screening, higher solid ink densities, or higher lpi AM/XM screening, etc. then, if nothing else changes, the tonal response on press will change due to the difference in dot gain:
New print characteristic tone curve caused by a change in screening method being used - what the presswork now looks like after changing the halftone screening.

The goal of implementing dot gain compensation plate curves is to make the new press work mimic the original target press tone response. In the above example, the boy's face should appear the same as the original image despite the dot gain caused by changing the halftone screening.

Creating the dot gain compensation plate curve

Building a dot gain compensation plate curve starts with comparing the current target tone response with the tone response of the new presswork. In this case run to the same solid ink densities, on the same paper and press - only the screening has been changed:
On the left is the current target tone curve and on the right is the new tone response resulting from the change in screening.

The graphs are then examined by looking at the original requested Postscript tone and the target response (left chart) and comparing it with the new tone response (right chart):
In the current target tone curve a 50% tone request resulted in a 68% tone in the presswork. That same target 68% was delivered in the new presswork from a requested tone value of 30%.

Put another way, we are looking for what requested tone value in our new presswork delivered the same final tone value in the target presswork. In this example a 30% tone request in the new presswork delivered the same tone value as a 50% request in the old while a 50% request in the new gave the same tone as a 70% request in the old.

Here's another way to visualize it:
Target 150 lpi compared with FM tone response.

Remapping the tones is simply doing this:
Find the tone in the new presswork that delivers the required tone response in the old target presswork.


The comparison between target curve and new current curve is made for each 10% change in tone.

The idea is then to map these values so that a tone request in the original file gets changed to a new value that produces the same final tone as the same tone request did in the old target presswork. The result is a lookup table for tone swapping.

In this example:

The requested 10% tone is remapped to request for a 4% tone
The requested 20% tone is remapped to request for a 10% tone
The requested 30% tone is remapped to request for a 18% tone
The requested 40% tone is remapped to request for a 24% tone
The requested 50% tone is remapped to request for a 30% tone
The requested 60% tone is remapped to request for a 40% tone
The requested 70% tone is remapped to request for a 50% tone
The requested 80% tone is remapped to request for a 65% tone
The requested 90% tone is remapped to request for a 80% tone

The lookup table creates the dot gain compensation plate curve.
The lookup table is applied in the workflow to remap the requested tones to the actual tones on plate that will deliver the desired final tones in the presswork. The result is tonal alignment of the presswork despite differences in dot gain.
On the left is the original target 150 lpi tone response. On the right is the "normalized" tone response of the FM screen.

Some points to keep in mind

1 - It does not matter if the plates are initially run "uncalibrated" or linear for the target presswork.
2 - A dot gain compensation plate curve is not usually applied to the tone range from 0%-5% and 95% to 100%.
3 - One dot gain compensation plate curve is usually applied to all process colors.
4 - There may be a need to apply a specific dot gain compensation plate curve to one of the process colors to maintain gray balance.
5 - Dot gain compensation plate curves cannot compensate for differences in gamut between FM/Stochastic screens and conventional AM/XM screens.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

FM/Stochastic Screening

The Benefits
Below are listed some of the reasons why printers adopt FM/Stochastic screening for some, or all, of their presswork. In the next posting I'll be going into more detail on some of the benefits that have not been covered in past posts on this topic.

1 - No screen angle moiré
2 - No subject moiré
3 - No rosettes
4 - Photographic/contone look
Some examples are mentioned HERE
5 - Greater tone and color stability as SIDs naturally vary during press run
6 - Larger color gamut
The reason for the increased color gamut is explained in the post HERE
7 - Faster drying
8 - Reduced ink usage - About 10-15% depending on tone content of the presswork.
The reason for reduced ink usage is explained HERE
9 - Tonal and color stability when misregistration occurs
10 - Halftone dot structure stability when misregistration occurs
11 - Competitive differentiator


It's important to understand that, when it comes to the press, how halftone dots are organized is not as important as the size of the actual dot. As a result, some of the benefits of FM/Stochastic screening are available to conventional AM/XM screening if the lpi (halftone frequency) is fine enough. Specifically benefits 6, 7, and 8 in the list above can be delivered by AM/XM screening if run at an equivalent lpi to the FM halftone. As a general guide, the lithographic AM/XM/FM equivalents for a "second order" FM screen at various dot sizes are shown below.
Color stability through the press run

Printing presses are stable - but not consistent. Solid ink densities will naturally vary through the press run, and when they do two things happen; dot gain varies, and ink density on the halftone dots varies. The result is variation in tone and color reproduction through the run.
When printers measure dot gain they measure it at the 50% tone value rather than at the 1% or 2% point because at around 50% dot gain variation is at its greatest.The tone variation happens because the large midtone dots in an AM/XM screen can accept more ink than the small dots in the highlights and deep shadows. Put another way, you can’t build a column of ink on a small dot, but the large dots around the 50% tone can take on the ink so they will grow the greatest. So, the midtone color gets darker and lighter as solid ink density naturally varies through the press run.

However, the halftone dots in an FM screen have a different ink profile.


FM screens effectively have small dots throughout the tone range. They act much like the highlight dots of an AM/XM screen and do not take on as much extra ink as SIDs naturally vary - so they remain more stable and hence the color remains more consistent through the run. For example, the below chart shows the dot gain profile (solid line) of a 133 lpi AM/XM screen and a 20 micron FM screen calibrated to match that dot gain profile. The dashed lines show the dot gain response when the solid ink density is raised by 30 points (i.e. 1.40 to 1.70) to magnify the difference. The curve with the small dashes shows the response of the FM screen, while the longer dashed line shows the response of the AM/XM screen.
The color and tone stability that FM screening provides is similar to that provided by heavy GCR color separations or ink reduction re-separation applications.

In some cases this on-press stability can be a two edged sword since, like heavy GCR separations, it does not allow the press operator the ability to move color quite as easily on press should the print buyer decide to be creative during a press approval. It also means that if the press operator makes a SID change, the region of color/tone shift will not be the same as that of an AM/XM screen.

That being said, consistency in color is usually the goal of presswork so the stability of FM screening is appreciated by printers and their customers as an excellent complement to their “print -by-the-numbers” goals.

Faster Ink Drying
One of the little known benefits of FM screening is that it helps the presswork dry faster. With FM screening, the tones are built with many small dots - effectively a “mist” rather than puddles of ink. The small FM dots carry a thinner ink film, and are distributed in a finer pattern that allows the ink to flash off its volatiles quicker causing the ink to dry faster than their AM/XM counterparts.

To illustrate how this benefit is achieved, looking at the same final tone value in the below image, on the left is a microphotograph of the large AM/XM dots while on the right is magnified the smaller FM dots.
In the below image I've taken those microphotographs of the dots and passed them through a 3D rendering program that translates density into height to see just how thick the ink film is. As you can see on the right, for the same final tone the FM screen has a thinner film of ink than the AM/XM dot.
The faster drying can also be demonstrated with a simple test. Below are three images printed on uncoated book stock, the lefthand image is 133 lpi, the center is 200 lpi, and the righhand image 20 micron FM. I then used a coin to scratch across the 3/C gradient as soon as the sheet came off the press:
It's very easy to see the marks made by the coin in the 133 and 200 lpi gradient - while the FM gradient is almost completely dry and hardly shows any marks from the coin at all.

The faster drying of FM screening brings other benefits, namely:
1- It's easier to align presswork with proof - since they are both dry one doesn't have to account for dryback
2 - Reduced setoff
3 - Prints better on uncoated, newsprint, foils and plastics
4 - Less spray powder is needed
5 - Less distortion on perfecting presses
6 - Jobs are faster to bindery
7 - Heatset presses may be able to lower their drying ovens a few degrees and thus save on energy costs

LPI Integrity
Even though most printers have experienced the problem, few have understood it. LPI integrity is a benefit of FM/Stochastic screening that may be a bit difficult to understand at first.

AM/XM screens generate a rosette pattern when all the screens are at the correct angles. A rosette is a high frequency moiré and as such is very unstable. If there is a slight misregistration, what happens is that the rosette pattern of the AM/XM screen changes - typically from clear-centered to dot centered. The next few images show the results of a half row shift in mis-registration:As the rosette shifts from being clear-centered to being dot-centered - the visibility of the rosette changes. Effectively, the rosette shifts from being high frequency to low frequency. Put another way, the effective lpi of the halftone can shift from a fine 175 lpi to a coarse 85 lpi as a result of slight misregistration. So, a rosette pattern that occurs in important skin colors may not be visible when in register, suddenly becomes very visible with slight misregistration. However, FM screens do not produce rosettes and as a result they maintain their lpi image integrity when slight misregistration naturally occurs.

Color Integrity When Misregistration Occurs

You can have the best presses and the best plate imaging available, however, because you are covering a sheet of paper with a mix of oil and water, squeezing and pulling it through the press - some amount of misregistration is an inevitable fact of press life. The impact of that misregistration on color and tone reproduction will depend on whether you are using an AM/XM or FM screen.

Here is a full sized image:

And here, enlarged, is a section of the image using an AM/XM screen on the left and an FM screen on the right. Both are in register.

And here is the same section but with the Magenta for both screens out of register by a half row of dots (1/300th of an inch) - considered within normal printing tolerances.
Notice how the dot structure in the rosette visibly changes in the AM/XM screen (175 lpi in this case) when it's out of register but the FM screen (20 micron in this case) remains stable since it does not have a rosette.

More importantly note the change in AM/XM rosette structure from clear-centered to dot-centered and back to clear-centered as it drifts in and out out of register. It’s like turning a light on and off and back again - so the color goes darker and lighter and darker and lighter through the run.

Also, misregistration changes the overprint and ratios of wet and dry trap. A blue made from Cyan and Magenta dots beside each other is not the same blue as when Magenta dots overprint the Cyan. The result is a color shift. So while the AM/XM presswork is going darker and lighter it is also shifting color from bluish to redish and back again as slight misregistration occurs. This can be particularly troublesome in, for example, car brochures where there are large expansive areas of neutral grey made up of 4/c process. Again, since FM screens don’t have a rosette the color and tone are better preserved with natural slight misregistration in presswork.

The bottom line - FM screening can help deliver more presswork color consistency - which, after all, is one of the main goals of printing.

Potential Issues
So far it's all good - but what about the potential downsides of FM/Stochastic screening?

A printing press or plate does not "know" how a pattern of halftone dots is arranged - it does not know whether the screening is AM/XM or FM. So, the problems related to FM screening are not usually the result of the halftone pattern itself, but by the size of the dots that make up the halftone screen. In that respect, FM screening shares the same problems associated with any high frequency halftone - FM or AM/XM.

This old Planeta press prints breakfast cereal boxes using FM screening for press runs that can last a week.

This new KBA press prints daily newspapers, inserts/flyers and commercial work using FM screening exclusively.

Here are some of the issues that can arise using FM and AM/XM screening.

1 - Grainy appearance in flat tint areas. This usually doesn't occur with AM/XM. There are several possible causes:
1) Poor screen design and/or using a first order FM screen pattern (see HERE for explanation). This problem has been overcome by modern second order FM screens.
2) Graininess can also result from a lack of plate imaging integrity e.g. plate doesn't have a high enough resolution for the dot size being used, and inconsistent plate imaging. Again it generally occurs with older first order FM screen designs. Graininess can also occur when screening back a spot color. This is because spot colors are normally not formulated to be halftone screened and hence their pigment grind may be too coarse for the dot size being used.


2 - Inability to align presswork color to an industry standard like SWOP, GRACoL7, etc. The higher the halftone screen frequency, AM/XM or FM, the larger the color gamut becomes (this is explained HERE and HERE). The extra gamut appears in one and two color screen tint builds making them appear more vibrant than the same screen tint build using a lower lpi AM/XM screen (e.g. 175 lpi). It usually only effects vector artwork and typically does not show up in raster images. If this is a problem it can be dealt with using color management and re-separating images to contaminate color builds to reduce the gamut. Unexpected color shifts can also occur when screening back a spot color. This is because spot colors are normally not formulated to be halftone screened and hence the impact of using a high frequency screen, with its increased gamut can lead to an unexpected final color appearance.

3 - Piling. Piling may occur on heatset web presses and is usually caused by not following proper blanket washup schedules or by poor ink rheology - i.e. using inks formulated for the large dots of a coarse AM/XM screen rather than formulated for the smaller FM dots. Piling is rare on sheetfed presses - typically an ik that works with a 200 lpi AM/XM screen will work with a 20-25 micron FM screen.

4 - Mottle. Mottle (splotchy appearance of flat tone areas) can appear with any high frequency screen. It is usually the result poor ink transfer (incorrect ink formulation), fountain solution condition, or paper surface/coating characteristics. Mottle can also occur when screening back a spot color. This is because spot colors are normally not formulated to be halftone screened and hence their pigment grind may be too coarse for the dot size being used.

5 - Poor image reproduction. The higher the lpi of the screen, AM/XM or FM, the higher the detail rendering and hence the better the detail, flaws, and artifacts of an original image are reproduced. Another problem can be a "softness" to the image reproduction. This is usually caused when high dpi images are resampled to a lower resolution when the PDF is created or resampled when the image goes through the RIP. The solution is to not resample images.

6 - General failure. The most common reasons that cause printers to fail with FM and high frequency AM/FM screening that I've encountered are:
1) Poor process control in the shop. Halftone screening in the range of 65-175 lpi is very tolerant of process variations however as the dots get smaller, process controls need to be tighter. That being said, the process controls that need to be in place for FM screening to succeed are no different than those needed for an efficient 175 lpi print manufacturing process. If there are any issues - high frequency screening will make those issues more visible.
2) Lack of buy-in. If the frontline people (e.g. prepress and/or press operators) have not bought into the idea of using FM screening - it will fail. Without buy-in the change merely represents a disruption to what they see as a smooth running process. "Why fix it if it ain't broke?"
3) Lack of use. If FM screening is only used for "special jobs" then press operators never get used to how it performs on press and as a result they will struggle with it. As with most activities, the more you do them the better you get at doing them. It is best if the shop makes the commitment to change to FM and make traditional AM/XM screening the special case exception.


In future posts I will be covering success strategies for implementing FM screening as well as general process control proceedures.

About 80% of all the directory printing in North America is done using FM screening.