Here's an example of a label that makes me go Grrrrrrrrrrr:
A can of Campbell's soup (yum, yum):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fda1c/fda1cbe87eb29b45a01b5d4a12a41b1dfb154369" alt=""
Ah, it contains 540mL of soup:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99103/9910302f22abe9d20584a3067a7e570e1fbfd870" alt=""
Grrrrrrrrrrr! The ingredients are listed based on 250mL:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6cab/e6cabe9475eaadfac09db81f07de80a5bd72717f" alt=""
Why aren't the ingredients listed based on 540mL (the can contents) or even 270mL (half a can)?
For some reason most soups, not just Campell's, suffer the same ingredient measurement mismatch.
Grrrrrrrrrrr!
At least the label is printed using FM screening. :-)
Well of the two Campbells soups you grrrrr'd about, I would opt for the can over the cup even if you need a calculator to evaluate the label. I read somewhere that when those cups get stacked, ink rubs off on to the inside before it's packed.
ReplyDelete